Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus user testing at MIT
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas Mailhot email enst fr>
- To: Reinout van Schouwen <reinout cs vu nl>
- Cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus user testing at MIT
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:27:46 +0100
Le ven, 05 jan 2001 14:33:41, Reinout van Schouwen a écrit :
> Hello Nicolas,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > This way it may work. However it does make the hourglass
> a
> > useless launch indicator, which was my point.
>
> Yes, but I think we can agree that this is a bad idea
> anyhow, having read the other replies.
Unfortunately that is not the consensus with most ex-windoze
users:((
> * unlike throbbers, difficult to see state of all windows
at
> a glance. Remember that you still have the active/inactive
color
> indication on the window title bars.
Wich means *nothing* about the app state, just the windows
focus state.
A window can be inacive without waiting for a mode dialog
> I'm using the Gnome version that came with Mandrake 7.2
> and it's definitely in there. :-)
'cos Mandrake is using xalf. Just try it with xalf
uninstalled. (and IMHO xalf is more a hack than a definitive
solution).
> So I don't know if this is some kind of Mandrake-specific
> enhancement
> (more like something that came from Helix?!) but it would
> be smart to
> incorporate this into the next Gnome release, if it's not
> already in.
>
> > launching state
>
> - see above
>
> > busy state
>
> - 'wait' mouse cursor
>
> > idle state
>
> - nothing special(?)
>
> > connecting state (for network apps)
>
> - throbber
>
> > question state (window stuck until a dialog been
> closed...)
>
> Do you mean modal dialogs?
Yes.
> > On the other hand, title bars/task list entries are
> clearly
> > associated with *one* window all the time, a lot of them
> can
> > be consulted simultaneously, so putting the hints there
> > would be the right thing IMHO.
>
> If you want to put indicators of all the mentioned states
> in the tasklist
> entries, the already small screen space that's available
> would become even
> more crowded.
Since these states are more or less exclusive, I was
thinking about a non binary throber : i.e. a throbber with
more than 2 (idle/connecting) states.
Less clutter than x different indicators, and no more
difficult than x cursor states.
xalf does this for startup -- you can expand this for all
usefull states. And putting it in the task list and the
title bar is good since a task list is no more than the list
of the same info that title bars already provide.
> Adding an extra indicator to the titlebar could be a good
> idea - I'm not quite sure about that.
Since the whole point of the title bar is provide more info
about a window, why not ?
--
Nicolas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]