Re: Removing gthtml2 (was Proposed modules for 2.10 wanted NOW)

[James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>]

Bill Haneman wrote:

> > but personally I'm not
> > too worried about the help browser being inaccessible if the web browser
> > is inaccessible.
>
>
> If help is inaccessible, the whole desktop is useless from an 
> accessibility point of view.  It's already true that some users will 
> chose web browsers other than the 'GNOME' one, i.e. Mozilla/Firefox or 
> even Links/Lynx instead of Epiphany.

Are you saying that Epiphany (based on Gecko) is accessible but Yelp 
(based on Gecko) isn't?  If that is the case, shouldn't it be quite easy 
to make Yelp accessible?  Wouldn't the reduction in the number of HTML 
rendering engines reduce the accessibility team's work?

James.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers