Re: Subversion migration schedule (cut-off Fri 18 Mar)

[Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>]

Daniel Veillard wrote:

>  Counter proposal, migrate projects one by one as their maintainers gives
> the go ahead to proceed with it. Keep an easilly accessible (for both humans
> and tools) list of what a given project is using at a point in time.
This is a really good question. Why can't some modules use CVS and 
others Subversion? It seems like it should be up to a maintainer of a 
module what SCM system they use. Those who wish to stick with CVS will 
be forced to go elsewhere if gnome.org drops its CVS support, which 
introduces new barriers to contributing.

--
Andrew
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers