Re: Bugzilla outstanding issues
- From: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla outstanding issues
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:31:01 -0500
> We need to discuss whether we want to have some
> <package>-maint bugzilla gnome org mail aliases
> for package maintainers like we had with the old
> bug tracker or whether we want to have all bugs
> assigned to individual persons.
As the person who all evolution-mail bugs get assigned to by default
at Helix Code, I vote for package-maint aliases. First, because then
everyone on the list can get the mail when a bug is added, and second,
because it makes it easier to see what a person is really working on.
(Theoretically, you can do this at bugzilla.helixcode.com by seeing
which bugs are "NEW danw" vs "ASSIGNED danw", but no one other than me
ever seems to notice this distinction. :)
> @severities = (
> "blocker",
> "critical",
> "major",
> "normal",
> "minor",
> "trivial",
> "enhancement"
> );
What do these all mean? Does the separation of "blocker" and
"critical" mean that we'll ship packages with "critical" bugs, and if
so, what does "critical" mean? What's the useful distinction between
"minor" and "trivial"?
> @opsys = (
I don't think we want/need this, or platform. Yeah, there will be bugs
that affect Solaris and not Linux, but you can just mention that in
the bug description, which people have done with the current system,
and I don't think it's been a problem. (The distinction makes much
more sense in Mozilla-land, where you have vastly separate Unix, Mac,
and Windows ports, and people working on one are likely to be
completely unable to do anything about bugs that are specific to
another.)
> trash - Bug report was closed because it was crap/useless etc.,
> set this keyword to distinguish it from other closed
> bug reports so we can exclude them in queries
Bugzilla already has this. You mark the bug "INVALID" rather than
"RESOLVED".
> helpwanted - Developer is looking for someone to help him with this
> bug report, for instance because he don't have time or
> he's unable to fix it himself
Hm... but you said it's hard to remove a keyword from a bug? Seems
like you might want to remove this after a while.
If you import the Eazel "inclination" hack, then that can convey
similar information.
> frequently-reported - This keyword should only be set by the
Nice!
-- Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]