Re: Bugzilla outstanding issues
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla outstanding issues
- Date: 06 Nov 2000 16:51:19 -0800
Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org> writes:
> 4.) Keywords
>
> It's easy to add new keywords, but more difficult to remove them
> later, so which keywords do we want to have ?
I suggest leaving out the keyword field entirely unless we are certain
there are keywords that are so important enough to have to oughtweigh
the cost of having an extra field. I don't think any of the ones below
fall in that category.
> I'd suggest the following list:
>
> trash - Bug report was closed because it was crap/useless etc.,
> set this keyword to distinguish it from other closed
> bug reports so we can exclude them in queries
>
> debbugs - Bug was imported from the old bug-tracker, my script will
> set this - useful to let developers exclude such bugs if
> they don't want to deal with them (most of them are crap
> anyways)
>
> helpwanted - Developer is looking for someone to help him with this
> bug report, for instance because he don't have time or
> he's unable to fix it himself
>
> discussion - Bug involves changing/adding a feature which needs some
> discussion or developer is asking for discussion about
> this bug; this can be quite useful to let other developers
> quickly search for such "bugs", can also be used for
> todo lists, feature suggestions etc.
>
> frequently-reported - This keyword should only be set by the maintainer
> and is useful when we get a very large number of duplicates. In this
> case the maintainer files a bug report with the most info he can get
> about the problem, including a soulution how to fix the problem,
> marks it as "frequently-reported" and marks all other bugs as
> duplicates of this one.
>
> This is intended mostly for users: they can easily browse the list
> of frequently reported bugs to quickly find the solution of their
> problem if it is already known (I mean, if such a bug is already
> fixed, but some user still has the problem, he can use this keyword
> to search for a solution of his problem).
> 5.) Products / Components / Versions
>
> I think this should be up to the maintainers of a package - ie. each
> maintainer of a package should create a product and individual components
> for his package and also decide which version numbers he wants to have.
>
> However, we may need a `general' component for each product to make debbugs
> importing work if the user did not specify a component.
>
Is there any way we can enable setting milestones per-product?
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]