Re: Bugzilla summary
- From: Drazen Kacar <dave srce hr>
- To: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- Cc: Drazen Kacar <dave srce hr>, Jes Sorensen <jes linuxcare com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla summary
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:24:40 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
> > But UltraSPARC is just one (Sun's) implementation of SPARC V9 (and it has
> > some extensions). So why not sparc v9? After all, there is HAL's SPARC64,
> > which is 64-bit sparc, but it's not Ultrasparc.
>
> How about sparc and sparc64 ?
>
> Hopefully the confused will be happy to click sparc anyway
Fine by me. I just didn't understand if Ultrasparc extensions are important
enough to make it different architecture. AFAIK, currently there is no
Ultra specific code anywhere. OTOH, SPARC64 is HAL's trademark
<URL:http://mpd.hal.com/> and it might not be acceptable category name
for that reason. On the third hand, UltraSPARC is also a trademark and
refers to a specific implementation of sparc v9 architecture.
--
.-. .-. Chaos, panic & disorder - my work here is done.
(_ \ / _)
| dave srce hr
| dave fly srk fer hr
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]