Re: pkg-config comments
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Martijn van Beers <martijn earthling net>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: pkg-config comments
- Date: 26 Nov 2000 10:44:55 -0500
James Henstridge <james daa com au> writes:
> > In GNOME 2.x we are already away from a macros directory, the macros are
> > installed by gnome-common, so that all applications - no matter whether they're
> > in GNOME CVS or outside of it - can use them.
>
> I thought the agreed on solution was to distribute these macros with the
> libraries/programs they are written for (where they belong). Having them
> in a special macros package is basically the same as what we have now.
I agree with James here - some central repository of .m4 files is
not the way to go.
It is slightly inconvenient for building packages with weird optional
dependencies (like gnome-python on gtkglarea) out of CVS, but I don't
think this is something for which we should be optimizing. And
pkg-config will vastly reduce the number of extra .m4 files we need
for things like this.
A pkgconfig .m4 file, should absolutely be distributed with pkgconfig,
since pkgconfig is in no way tied to GNOME at all.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]