Re: The big gnome-hackers -> gnome-private move

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com> writes:
> Why do we need to not use gnome-hackers for that period? I'm disturbed
> to see discussion that should not be secret and is about technical
> issues on gnome-private when it clearly should be on gnome-hackers by
> the rules people stated.
> 

It will probably take a couple weeks for everyone to catch on that
gnome-hackers isn't private, so it's useful to bounce
intended-to-be-private mails for a while instead of having them go
public.

Havoc