Re: Bugzilla for GNOME (was Re: GNOME CVS: nautilus mathieu)
- From: Mark Gordon <mtgordon helixcode com>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>
- Cc: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, Josh Barrow <josh eazel com>, Jacob Ulysses Berkman <jacob helixcode com>, Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>, gnome-private gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla for GNOME (was Re: GNOME CVS: nautilus mathieu)
- Date: 28 Oct 2000 00:54:13 +0500
Joe wrote:
> > Adding Bugzilla support to bug-buddy is much better than an email interface;
> > this'll also allow us to add some ideas from
> > http://bugzilla.eazel.com/helper.html.
>
> I disagree. Using a web interface requires that you (a) have an account on
> the Bugzilla, (b) log into this account, (c) do HTTP POSTs and other such
> things to send it to the server. This means that bug-buddy will have to
> depend on some HTTP library, such as libghttp or gnome-vfs. Suck.
>
> An email interface allows you to (a) queue up mail if you are not
> connected, since sendmail/exim/whatever will hold it until it can send it
> without blocking the GUI and (b) requires no additional software than what
> comes with your system. Just fork and exec sendmail, baby. Oh, and it
> doesn't require rearchitecturing bug-buddy.
I like the idea of using email as one option for creating bug reports. The major advantages of bugzilla vs.
deb-bugs as I see it (YMMV) are that its query capabilities are greater and that it's easier to maintain the
database through a web front-end than through email.
-Mark Gordon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]