Re: Bugs in Bugzilla
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Mike Shaver <shaver zeroknowledge com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-private gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bugs in Bugzilla
- Date: 27 Oct 2000 22:14:42 +0200
Mike Shaver <shaver zeroknowledge com> writes:
> Is this a place where you might want to use UNCONFIRMED for bugs without
> addresses, and NEW for bugs from people with accounts?
>
> Of course, if you make the reporter for anonymous bugs be the same
> (anonymous bugs gnome org, say), then your bug list queries can just
> exclude them.
Hi,
well, I think we should use UNCONFIRMED for everything which comes in over
the debbugs wrapper, but NEW for bugs which are submitted with bug-buddy
(maybe include a `bug-buddy' keyword for them) if we use that Bugzilla
interface for it which I proposed.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
