Re: The state of our web site and standards
- From: Ville Pätsi <drc gnome org>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: The state of our web site and standards
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:10:31 +0300
These 2.6K bytes were from Telsa Gwynne,
> Agreed, Bobby is picky. So is htmltidy (which demands summary attributes
> for any table).
This raises an another problem. I frequently use the program "tidy" to verify
my html. This program is created by a person from the w3c. It validates the
code of my homepage as complete html 4.0. ( http://canvas.gnome.org/~drc/ )
But when I run it trough http://validator.w3.org/ , it gives a bunch of errors.
Now which program is right? How are we supposed to produce valid html if the
checker programs don't validate their results between each other?
Before going into a discussion about forcing people to use validators, we
should choose which one to support and use. The best way propably would be
that the w3 create a piece of transportable code that would be used by all
validators.
--
Ville Pätsi -- drc gnome org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]