Re: GNOME CVS: gnome-core mmclouglin
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>, Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, Michael Meeks <michael trna ximian com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>, Carlos Perell? Mar?n <carlos gnome-db org>, gnome-hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: gnome-core mmclouglin
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:53:10 +0100 (CET)
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So what's inherently more lightweight in SOAP in comparison to CORBA?
>
> Thats still comparing whales to one another.
I don't see what huge amounts of superflous information CORBA the protocol
passes around that qualifies it as a 'whale'. Sure it would rule to be
able to trasmit data (in this case, method invocation requests) without
using any actual bandwidth, but there's this evil 'Physics' thing that
keeps us from doing that.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Nincs munkám, nincs fedezetem, milyen hitelt tudna ajánlani?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
