Re: network transparency (Re: GNOME CVS: gnome-core mmclouglin)
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington)
- Cc: rodrigo gnome-db org (Rodrigo Moya), jdub perkypants org (Jeff Waugh), gnome-hackers gnome org (GNOME Hackers), gnome-components-list gnome org (GNOME Components)
- Subject: Re: network transparency (Re: GNOME CVS: gnome-core mmclouglin)
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 14:02:05 -0500 (EST)
> networking; i.e. nice interfaces for doing networking, that go ahead
> and expose the things you need to worry about, such as asynchronicity
> and latency, and give you nice tools to manage them. Burying those
> things under "transparency" is not a win, it just means people don't
> deal with them.
Actually there are two approaches, and there are good arguments for either
1. You don't pretend and you expose the reality to apps.
[The "core doesnt have enough info to anticipate" argument]
2. You embed it into the language itself
[The "only the core can see the whole picture and make global
decisions" argument]
It's possible to take a smalltalk or squeak application and make the entire
thing distributed with close to no changes to the application for example.
Alan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]