Re: Getting Bugzilla support into Bug-buddy
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>
- Cc: Russell Steinthal <rms39 columbia edu>, Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, gnome-hackers gnome org, Karl Eichwalder <ke suse de>
- Subject: Re: Getting Bugzilla support into Bug-buddy
- Date: 07 Feb 2001 15:23:17 +0100
Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Martin Baulig wrote:
> >
> > But what do you want to do with them ?
>
> If there is a valid package I think they should go to the package
> list, even if the return address is invalid. If there is no valid
> package AND no valid email then there is little that can be done.
Maybe you misunderstood me, but there's a technical problem with this:
When people send such bug reports, they get an auto-reply and this
auto-reply is sent back via mail. If the return address is invalid, this
mail will normally bounce.
And this is the problem; I don't care much about such bug reports, all
I can do about them is
a) take an email address where all bounce messages should go.
b) take a patch which implements a parser of such bounce messages to do
something reasonable with the bug report.
I'm also accepting package-specific forwarding addresses and patches to
implement filters (*) to forward such bugs to some package maintainer
address rather than rejecting them.
(*) can for instance be a simple .procmailrc entry
Of course, it'd be much better if bug-buddy could send all bugs directly
to the right bug tracking system.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]