Re: Quo vadis, GNOME? (was: Getting Bugzilla support into Bug-buddy)
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- Cc: aaron ximian com (Aaron Weber), gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Quo vadis, GNOME? (was: Getting Bugzilla support into Bug-buddy)
- Date: 07 Feb 2001 12:46:50 -0500
> Thats what is happening in Gnome. Much of the libraries don't need great new
> adventure, and Im actually glad a lot of the new 'megawidgets' are being pushed
> into seperate libraries.
>
> If things continue as they do then once the foundations rot through, which isnt
> that far off, the entire edifice will come tumbling down.
This is an issue that we have been discussing informally and recently
in the board of directors call.
The proposal I have been talking to people about is to integrate
various of the components that have reached a level of matturity and
stability into the foundations for the GNOME 2.0 platform.
What I have suggested in the past goes along these lines:
* Drop the dead code from GNOME libs or code that is
superseded by code in Gtk+ 2.0.
* Include the GNOME VFS in the core gnome-libs 2.0 (or a part
of it? I am not sure).
* Include the core of Bonobo (or all of the "foundation" parts
of it) in gnome-libs 2.0.
* Move some of the widgets from Gal into Gtk+ or GnomeLibs 2.0
as maturity permits. Indeed, I hope that at least the
new ComboBox gets in some way or another into Gtk+ 2.0
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]