Re: time for a flamewar, or ... what about grdb
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: jg pa dec com (Jim Gettys)
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, ALIABDIN aucegypt edu (Ali Abdin), jirka 5z com (George), gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: time for a flamewar, or ... what about grdb
- Date: 09 Feb 2001 20:34:20 -0500
[
This has nothing to do with my opinion of grdb. I think that in
principle grdb is a program we need to have due to the nature of X.
]
> Now, if I run applications around a network, I get random settings (usual
> default), rather than the applications getting their customizations from
> the X server.
>
> This SUCKS ROCKS.
I would say that:
* Remote applications are barely the rule these days.
* True network transparency is non-existant anyways, as you
wont be sharing the file systems across applications running
in two computers.
* The assumptions X made about the computing environment (the
way networks and workstations are used) never quite
cristalized and it is definetly not the common usage in
todays computing environment.
So, yes, it is unfortunate, but if anything X resources are just a
suboptimal solution for a very tiny problem. On top of being a
suboptimal solution for a non-existing problem, X resources introduce
a set of broken ideas. The "Unix Haters Book" goes into a hilarious
and sad look at X resources.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]