Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Sam TH <sam uchicago edu>
- Cc: Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>, Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, Alan Cox <alan redhat com>, "John R. Sheets" <dusk ravendusk org>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- Date: 17 Feb 2001 00:30:39 -0500
Sam TH <sam uchicago edu> writes:
> So GNOME as an organization has two choices: make a decision, which
> will be unpopular with some people, or punt, and pretend that a
> decision doesn't need to be made.
>
But what is the exact decision to make? I still see mostly a
metaphysical question here. What is the
affecting-actions-taken-by-someone practical decision that is actually
facing us right now? i.e. what do you think the GNOME project should
_do_ on this issue?
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
