Re: Proposal for new naming schema
- From: Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Christian Meyer <chrisime mailing uni de>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for new naming schema
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:41:00 +0100
Martin Baulig wrote:
> This naming scheme is just totally stupid, you'll end up having some CVS branch
> without knowing for which package version it was created.
>
> You can set a CVS tag for the final release for 1.4 etc., but branches normally
> exist for a very long time and you cannot really know in which GNOME release
> the branch will go at the time you create it.
My proposal is to mark branches with SCHEDULED-FOR-GNOME-1-4 or some
such.
For example, the package "foo" maintainers will create a branch that
will end up in a version that will be in Gnome 1.4.
They name the branch "foo-0-8" since that's the "foo" version numbering
for their intended release. On the same time, they mark it with the tag
SCHEDULED-FOR-GNOME-1-4 (I'm sure others have better suggestion for a
standardized tag name).
This will help translators a lot, by providing a hint directly in the
module which branch's translations should be updated for Gnome 1.4.
Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]