Re: My vision of gnome-libs (was Re: GNOME 2.0 meeting summary)
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: George <jirka 5z com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: My vision of gnome-libs (was Re: GNOME 2.0 meeting summary)
- Date: 20 Feb 2001 14:01:47 -0800
Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I think libcompat is a bit wrong for exactly this reason - you get
> circular dependencies between libcompat and gnome-libs for example.
>
> Why not just leave the stuff in libgnome(ui) and do #ifndef
> GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, consistent with GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED.
>
OK; although I think there should be two levels of this,
GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED and GNOME_ENABLE_COMPAT (where you have to
explicitly ask for really old stuff). Havoc, woudl you mind posting
the Gtk deprecation policy you posted on gtk-devel-list a while back
so we can consider using a similar policy for gnome-libs?
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]