Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:35:18PM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> 
> Tomasz has had access to CVS for about two years. 
> 

  Well if someone changes completely the structure
of a module, doing cvs delete/cvs add without reading the HACKING
nor contacting the maintainers, well this person should not be allowed
to commit directly. Restricting them to send patches to the maintainer
is okay.
  I can't understand that after 2 years of access one can ignore
that doing this kind of things is simply improper.

> >   I ask he be first removed CVS commit capability,
> > and I ask for help to recover the previous setup of
> > gnome-xml head,
> 
> I think Tomasz is aware of his mistake (or will soon be).  I see no
> reason to remove his CVS account given his new grasped knowledge from
> your message.

  I don't want ACLs but I want the rules to be clear. Communication,
not restrictions. There is multiple ways to get people to follow the
law, I prefer education. And if someone still misbehaves, then
take action ...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/