Re: control-center reorganization in CVS

[Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>]

Martin Baulig wrote:
> 
> Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM> writes:
> 
> > On 7 Jul 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> >
> > > > ehhhh... I think making a new module just to "cover up" gross things
> > > > having happened in cvs is not the way to go. IMHO we need to choose
> > > > between:
> > > >   a) live with the new-* directories, usng cvs delete and repository
> > > >      copying to create a consistent source there
> > > >   b) consolidate the sources to the old directory, using repository
> > > >      copy for non-conflicting files and add a suffix (-new, 2,
> > > >      whatever) for those that conflict and cvs delete anything that
> > > >      isn't needed.
> > >
> > > I'd vote for b).
> > >
> >
> > b) is clearly the Right Thing (TM) to do, except it can be more
> > work-intensive.
> 
> I may have some time to look at it tomorrow.

The gnome-control-center module is now building and has the latest
souce code and a new configure.in file. The control-center-plus has
the "advanced" (or useless if you want to call them differently)
capplets.

I don't see what is SOooo wrong about the new module. It seems to me
that
not everyone is aware on how messy the old module was.

regards,
Chema