Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- From: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- To: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- Date: 20 Jun 2001 00:20:26 +0500
> > * A benevolent dictator (or dictators) whose decisions everyone
> > accepts
> > * Massive infighting and backstabbing among developers
> > * A fork into two smaller projects
>
> I agree. So which one do we want ?
>
> we are currenlty in 2, option 3 is not really an option.
> So either we say in option 2 or go back to option 1 which nobody seems
> to like.
I was assuming it was a given that we can't get back to option 1. So I
was implying we try Havoc's suggestion.
-- Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]