Re: About compatibility in GNOME 2 (was Re: Compatibility stuff)

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com> writes:
> >         Whilst initialy disagreeing with Martin, and loathing hacks like:
> >
> >                 #define GTK_OBJECT_TYPE G_OBJECT_TYPE
> 
> Why is this particular change necessary, when gtk+ HEAD already has a
> GTK_OBJECT_TYPE() macro that does the equivalent thing?
> 

The actual hack Martin wanted was:

 #define G_OBJECT_CLASS GTK_OBJECT_CLASS

in GTK 1.2.x. Michael has it backward there.

Havoc