Re: GNOME user environment brainstorming
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- Cc: Glynn Foster <glynn foster ireland sun com>, GNOME hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME user environment brainstorming
- Date: 24 May 2001 21:25:07 -0400
ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
>
> Please don't remove all the fun parts that give GNOME its spirit ("The F
> in GNOME stands for Fun"). Removing some (like the binary clock[1]:) is OK
> but Wanda has been with us since the very beginning, we shouldn't dump her
> now that we're successful and can stand on our own without any help from
> her:)
>
> [1] A friend of mine actually uses the binary clock -- he said it took him
> two or three days to get used to it, but now he's so much into it that
> he's even thinking about creating a hardware bnary clock:)
>
FWIW I meant "unacceptable to remove Wanda" not "Wanda is
unacceptable." Horrors that anyone should think otherwise. ;-)
I think something like Binary Clock is fine under the Amusements
menu. I just don't think it should be where it can be confused with an
actual clock. And > 1 non-toy clocks is just dumb.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]