[no subject]

-Seth

On 28 May 2001 17:44:08 -0400, Iain wrote:
> 
> > How pathetic. How utterly pathetic.
> 
> Thanks, I tried my best.
> 
> > If XFCE is better than Gnome then learn from them. Perhaps you've forgotten the
> > goal of a single desktop where all the apps work together be they gnome,
> > kde or other.
> > 
> > And yes on a low end box XFCE has Gnome completely and totally pasted. That
> > is a good thing because either Gnome has to get lighter or make a concious
> > decision that XFCE is the better choice for low end boxes and stop worrying
> > about being a bad desktop on slower boxes/handheld/pda devices and just get
> > on with being good at the high end
> 
> Where does "Learning from them and making all apps work together" and
> "Printing articles about them that didn't actually meantion GNOME at
> all*" intersect? I don't see it at all. And if they do somehow cross,
> why don't we print KDE articles, cos they quite often meantion GNOME,
> and after all there's always the goal of a single desktop where all the
> apps work together be they gnome, kde or others to think about.
> 
> (Bear in mind, I'm not arguing about any technical merits or lack
> thereof in any of the projects meantioned, I just don't think articles
> about them are relevant on a GNOME website).
> 
> iain
> *Meantioning the word "Nautilus" once does not count.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> 
>