Re: Nautilus and Setup Tools
- From: jg pa dec com (Jim Gettys)
- To: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Nautilus and Setup Tools
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:49:51 -0800 (PST)
> Sender: gnome-private-members-admin gnome org
> From: Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:28:19 -0500 (EST)
> To: Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>
> Cc: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
> Subject: Re: FW: Nautilus and Setup Tools
> -----
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Jody Goldberg wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:53:18PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a _perfect_ example of why GNOME can't be the OS. GNOME
> > > may have the best font system in the world, but unless the user
> > > sees consistent font installation across:
> > >
> > > - KDE
> > > - Mozilla
> > > - StarOffice
> > > - "Native" GNOME apps
> > >
> > > Then the user will think "my desktop/GNOME has broken fonts".
> >
> > That is a laudable goal. Is there any chance of this happening ?
> > There appear to be alot of obstacles. Frankly I'd prefer to see
> > a potentially gnome specific solution if it could be done within our
> > lifetimes. A cardinal rule of development would seem to apply :
> >
> > It is easier to ask contrition than permission
> >
> > Specify a decent mechanism and possibly it will be adopted
> > by other projects.
>
> Keith is working on specifying one, but I don't see anyone helping him.
> Here is a mail from him about this issue:
>
> http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/fonts/2001-September/000869.html
>
> Perhaps we can discuss this with him at ALS.
>
Keith arrives here Wednesday. I think this is a vital topic, and one
which we should push on quickly.
- Jim
--
Jim Gettys
Cambridge Research Laboratory
Compaq Computer Corporation
jg pa dec com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]