Re: On the cost of libraries
- From: Colm Smyth <Colm Smyth sun com>
- To: Colm Smyth sun com, dave willfork com
- Cc: Sander Vesik sun com, dave arsdigita com, otaylor redhat com, alexl redhat com, mjs noisehavoc org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: On the cost of libraries
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
>> It can also be quite handy when trying to resolve
>> nasty problems, for example when trying to combine
>> two libraries that each expect to be able to override
>> the C++ global new() operator, you can specify a different
>> "global" new() symbol binding for each library!
>
>Uh... I think this would backfire sooner or later. How about using -B group
>or -z groupperm instead?
Why do you think it would backfire? You can't get more explicit than
actually stating precisely the library that contains a symbol
definition.
I didn't know about the -B group and -z groupperm options, looking
at the man-page I can see they would also be useful in a number
of situations.
Colm.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]