Re: GNOME CVS: libgnomeui baddog
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- Cc: Gnome Hacker List <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgnomeui baddog
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:57:27 +0800 (HKT)
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > . : ChangeLog configure.in
> >
> > Log message:
> > Add missing gnome-vfs-module path in CFLAGS
>
> Is this really the right way to do this? Or should libgnome-2.0.pc also
> have gnome-vfs-2.0 as a "Requires:"? The latter seems better to me.
libgnome-2.0.pc already listed gnome-vfs-2.0 as Requires; the path
in question belongs to gnome-vfs-module-2.0.pc .
Actually I have thought about adding gnome-vfs-module-2.0 as
libgnome-2.0.pc requirement too, but it seems that programs needing
libgnome-2.0 doesn't always need gnome-vfs-module-2.0 at the same
time. In other words, gnome-vfs-module-2.0 sounds not mandatory for
libgnome-2.0 .
In this case, is there any better way to resolve it? I'm not so
confident of my change (other than the fact that libgnomeui compiles
along with gnome-vfs 1.9.3 now).
Abel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]