Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: uraeus linuxrising org, Sander Vesik Sun COM
- Cc: gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:27:40 +0100 (BST)
Sander said:
>I have no idea how sun feels, except I really can't see it wanting UI
>freeze inbetween major releases (I can already see how billh and many
>others would think of even suggesting such a thing).
...
I take it you meant "wouldn't think of suggesting such a thing"
;-)
Actually I think UI freezes are a good thing, if they are relaxed at
regular and predictable intervals (such as 'dot-releases'). But I think
that a gnome UI (appearance, at least) that changed from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1
would be a "bad thing".
As for 2.0.0 -> 2.0.1, perhaps we should be a little less rigid. But in
general you don't want to have to reissue docs for "dot.dot" releases.
Not to mention the annoyance of having to relearn how things work every
few weeks :-(
Again, I am not speaking for Sun here :-)
but my expectation is that dot-dot UI freezes would be desired, and that
some amount of UI change at "dot" releases would be OK.
-Bill
------
Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]