Re: GNOME 1.4.1 beta2
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>
- Cc: GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, gnome-packaging-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 1.4.1 beta2
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 07:47:49 -0400
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:59:14AM +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> Den ons, 2001-09-05 kl. 04:58 skrev Havoc Pennington:
> >
> > Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no> writes:
> > > I'd really like to see a new gnome-core released for this beta and the
> > > same goes for gnome-utils. If there are other packages that should be
> > > updated please give me a heads up.
> > >
> >
> > Do you think we could get new releases for libraries with their header
> > files moved to avoid conflicts with GNOME 2?
> >
>
> Yes. This would be a great oportunity to do this.
>
> > This would affect probably gnome-libs, ORBit, etc. GConf should
> > already be done. I think eel is done. gtk and deps are done. James
> > just said on IRC he's going to do libglade. I don't know about most of
> > the others.
> >
>
> Anyone else?
This should not afect libxml1 since it uses $prefix/include/gnome-xml
while libxml2 uses $prefix/include/libxml
Now I may get convinced to try to "fix" libxml2 if I get instructions
about it and a clear picture on how it really solve the problem. Let's
say I'm nearly convinced this is needed but I want to read written
description of the suggested change to implement it.
In that case I would release libxml2-2.4.4 before GNOME 1.4.1 beta2
(you're shipping libxml2 right ?).
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]