Re: What to do in order to make the gnome development platform rock.
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- Cc: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth gnu org>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: What to do in order to make the gnome development platform rock.
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:00:01 -0400
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:13:38PM +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > org.gnome.xml - libxml (if it makes sence to
> > bind)
>
> It does, except not in this way. The way that would make sense to have a
> binding for libxml/libxslt would be a wrapper that would allow it to be
> used as a "standard" sax/dom parser a'la xerces/xalan. If you can't do
> that, there is no point in doing the binding.
yes there is because lib2xml/libxslt API is a very large superset of what's
available with SAX/DOM. Xalan implements a number of extensions too, they
didn't restrict them to those API. And the Java people seems to anyway try
to push for yet one more Java XML tree interface. I really don't see why
people should not write Java wrappers for libxml/libxslt. And as maintainer
I tell they can go ahead, I'm just not personally interested in the effort.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]