Re: libsoup as a replacement for gnome-http
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: libsoup as a replacement for gnome-http
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 06:53:11 -0400
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:41:02AM -0400, Alex Graveley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 10:14, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > On 18 Sep 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > gnome-http
> >
> > Does something actually use - or will be using gnome-http in gnome-2.0?
>
> It has been suggested that I introduce the libsoup library as a
> replacement for gnome-http in Gnome 2. libsoup is well integrated with
> Glib, and with the platform in general, supports a lot of cool features
> not in gnome-http (see below), and is flexible without being too
> lowlevel.
yes it sounds cool. The question is "does it makes sense to incorporate
it as part of the platform at this point ?"
- how many apps other than Soup itself are using it ?
- how easilly can it replace gnome-http
- I assume the Licence is LGPL or compatible
- I assume there is some guarantee of having it maintained
Is this a separate module in CVS ? Is it packaged separately ? How
much overlap with gnome-vfs HTTP module ?
Lots of questions, little time, even less data for the analysis.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]