Re: libsoup as a replacement for gnome-http
- From: Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: libsoup as a replacement for gnome-http
- Date: 19 Sep 2001 12:48:28 -0400
Hi,
On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 12:16, Joe Shaw wrote:
> (a) It hasn't been ported to the 2.0 platform. This might be
> significant as there has been a lot of work done on GIOChannels (mostly
> for UTF-8, if I understand correctly)
Indeed, this might take some effort.
> (b) The API has changed as recently as last week. To be a platform
> library, we have to be ready to commit to an API (pretty much) forever.
> Are you happy enough with the API as it is to freeze it? I know that I
> (for example) would like to see the SoupAuth structure refcounted so it
> can be used in multiple SoupContexts.
The SoupAuth structure isn't exported, so this could be implemented
without changing the existing API. But yes, there are a few API issues
I'm not happy with - auth propagation, headers with multiple values -
but nothing I couldn't shore up with proper motivation :)
> As for gnome-http, I'd suggest it be moved out of the "official"
> platform and encourage Soup's use instead, as it has many features
> lacking from gnome-http and integrates very nicely with the glib/gtk+
> mainloop.
I'm fine with this, but are people okay with not having an official HTTP
library?
-Alex
--
make: *** No rule to make target `sense'. Stop.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]