Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001



[decreased cc: list length]

On 19 Sep 2001, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:

> > If the license terms aren't acceptable, that's perfectly understandable,
> 
>   BTW, just FYI, we are changing the GAL licensing into LGPL.
> 

8-)

This is good news.

>   Although, I do agree that GAL shouldn't be part of the 2.0 platform,
> for the various reasons people have been pointing out.
> 

Ok, so can we drop this part of the discussion and move on?

> -- 
> Ettore
> 

	Sander

I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]