Re: Gnome 2.0 policy question

[Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>]

On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:37:50PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Do we have a CVS policy for committing changes to applications to
> > build them with Gnome 2.0 API's - should the 1.2/1.4 version become a
> > CVS branch ?
> 
> Not sure if it's a "policy" of any sort, but that has certainly been the
> common practice in the heavily worked on things at the moment
> (libgnome, libgnomeui, gnome-core, gnome-applets ... some others I
> guess). It sounds like a sensible path to follow.
> 

What we certainly don't want is everybody creating a news cvs module for
the port to gnome 2!

> Malcolm
> 
> -- 
> Success always occurs in private and failure in full view.
> 
> 

	Sander

I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.