Re: GtkHTML2 (was Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001)

From: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
Cc: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
Subject: Re: GtkHTML2 (was Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001)
Date: 26 Sep 2001 15:32:37 -0400

    Unless you're planning to spend piles of effort on GtkHTML2, that seems
    like the only reasonable option, I'd agree.
    
    (Does anyone else find it confusing that GtkHTML and GtkHTML2 are
    totally different codebases and the APIs aren't compatible at all?
    Should we maybe rename one of these?)

  I do.  I think renaming GtkHTML 2 at this point would make sense...

-- 
Ettore

References:
- Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001
  - From: Bill Haneman
- GtkHTML2 (was Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001)
  - From: Joe Shaw
- Re: GtkHTML2 (was Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001)
  - From: Ettore Perazzoli
- Re: GtkHTML2 (was Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001)
  - From: Havoc Pennington

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]