Re: Non-C bindings in GNOME
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, bonobo <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Non-C bindings in GNOME
- Date: 18 Aug 2002 17:40:25 +0100
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 15:41, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Murray Cumming writes:
>
> > I doubt that it's possible to find a common ground for all programming
> > languages, and it's clear that the current VM/CLR ideas do not succeed
> > in this. It might cover lots of intentionally-under-featured languages
> > (e.g. Java, VB) and interpreted languages (e.g Perl, Python), but not
> > all programming languages. .NET's "Managed C++" is a perfect example of
> > this, and I don't want to go there.
>
> Managed C++ only exposes bits for your application to interact with the VM
> in a controlled fashion. You are not required to use any extensions if you
> just want to run on the CLR.
>
> You just compile with the /clr option to the C++ compiler and feed all your
> existing code to it. In fact, making Word compile with the /clr compiler
> was a routine test.
But surely any CLR API could only be used from Managed C++ not all of
C++. I believe that means use of Managed C++ extensions and no use of
some regular C++ techniques.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]