Re: gep-1
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, <fcrozat mandrakesoft com>, bonobo <gnome-components-list gnome org>, orbit-list <orbit-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gep-1
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:31:22 +0100 (IST)
Hi Murray,
On 27 Aug 2002, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 21:53, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > I would prefer complete merge or complete separation, rather than
> > > something in-between, for the sake of simplicity. And I would prefer
> > > complete merge because it requires less work.
> >
> > Okay fair enough. I would be swayed towards the separation of
> > the two then. We already have bindings language bindings that rely on
> > ORBit2 internals (although it should be possible to make the scripting
> > bindings not do this) so the c++ binding would just become another in
> > the set.
>
> Can you give us some kind of timescale for you to do this work? We have
> already spent a lot of time on the branch and for the last few weeks
> we've just been waiting for the merge. I don't look forward to yet more
> delay. It seems a little late to be this idealistic.
This isn't a big job at all. A couple of days at the very
outside. We just need to come to a decision.
Good Luck,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]