Re: Patch to get gnome-vfs building against HEAD
- From: Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Peter Williams <peter newton cx>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Patch to get gnome-vfs building against HEAD
- Date: 16 Dec 2002 16:34:19 +0100
man, 2002-12-16 kl. 14:49 skrev Michael Meeks:
> On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 01:03, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > pkg-config was fixed long ago. This is something else. Owen knows what
> > it is and already investigated, there's a glib bug in bugzilla about
> > it.
>
> How can it be something else when the proposed fix is to do:
>
> - gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.2"
> + gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.2 \
> + gthread-2.0 >= 2.0.2"
>
> To a scad of configure.in's PKG_CONFIG checks ? that just has to mean
> that the -pthread is getting fumbled somewhere inside pkg-config -
> surely.
>
> For someone that can replicate this problem; I'd be very interested in
> the difference between the output of:
>
> pkg-config --cflags gthread-2.0
> and
> pkg-condig --cflags linc
>
This is my output for these:
[kmaraas sevilla libxml2]$ pkg-config --cflags gthread-2.0
-pthread -I/gnome/head/INSTALL/include/glib-2.0
-I/gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/glib-2.0/include
[kmaraas sevilla libxml2]$ pkg-config --cflags linc
-pthread -I/gnome/head/INSTALL/include/linc-1.0
-I/gnome/head/INSTALL/include/glib-2.0
-I/gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/glib-2.0/include
[kmaraas sevilla libxml2]$
> It looks to me that this is just an artefact of people using old
> pkg-configs. Is there a PKG_REQUIRE_VERSION(>=0.14) or somesuch we can
> do to help people ?
>
I'm also using 0.14.0 here.
Cheers
Kjartan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]