Hello,
Am Mittwoch, den 06. Februar 2002 07:07:19 schrieb Daniel Veillard:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:29:31AM +0100, M G Berberich wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Am Wednesday, den 06. February 2002 01:06:50 schrieb Miguel de Icaza:
> >
> > > My experience so far has been positive, and I have first
> > > hands experience on the productivity benefits that these
> > > technologies bring to the table. For instance, our C# compiler is
> > > written in C#. A beautiful piece of code.
> >
> > Why not writing a C#-frontend and a CLI-backend for gcc? This would
> > would not only give a C# -> CLI Compiler but also a
> > C# -> [any_architecture] and a {c, c++, ,,,} -> CLI compiler.
>
> See the FAQ !
> http://www.go-mono.org/faq.html#gcc
Yes, but the question is: Why is Ximian throwing its manpower on a
standalone C# -> CLI compiler instead of working on gcc.
MfG
bmg
--
"Des is völlig wurscht, was heut beschlos- | M G Berberich
sen wird: I bin sowieso dagegn!" | berberic fmi uni-passau de
(SPD-Stadtrat Kurt Schindler; Regensburg) | www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~berberic
Attachment:
pgpOfbuMbH7CM.pgp
Description: PGP signature