Re: GNOME 2.0 Desktop 'Alpha' Release
- From: Laszlo PETER <Laszlo Peter ireland sun com>
- To: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- Cc: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>, Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com>, "Matthew J. Doller" <mdoller wpi edu>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Desktop 'Alpha' Release
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:41:28 +0000
Hi,
jacob berkman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-01-11 at 12:29, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> > Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 09:02, Matthew J. Doller wrote:
> > > > if binary rpms are made available, would it be possible to have them be
> > > > relocatable? if i'm going to install an alpha of gnome2, i'd like it to
> > > > go into /opt, or /opt/gnome2
> > >
> > > Well, theoretically, the RPMS are relocatable. However, since there are
> > > current docs on relocating RPMs, these aren't tested. If you want to
> > > test this feel free, and let me know where things break, and I'll see
> > > what I can fix.
> > > Greg
> >
> > Unfortunately, we compile the location a program is installed into in
> > libgnome, meaning that RPM is unrelocatable, even if the files are.
>
> i umm thought this was supposed to be fixed in gnome 2.
Actually, there are a lot of absolute paths fixed in the binaries at
build time. For example:
- locale directory
- icon/pixmap directory
- configuration files ($prefix/etc, $prefix/share)
It would be nice to change these to relative paths based on the location
of the binary or some magic environment variable.
Laca
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]