Re: GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS() not doing good.
- From: German Poo Caaman~o <gpoo ubiobio cl>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS() not doing good.
- Date: 17 Jan 2002 14:46:58 -0300
El jue, 17-01-2002 a las 13:42, Owen Taylor escribió:
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gnome-core/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.352
> diff -u -p -r1.352 configure.in
> --- configure.in 2002/01/16 11:33:01 1.352
> +++ configure.in 2002/01/17 16:39:32
> @@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
> AC_PREREQ(2.13)
>
> +# Save this value here, since CFLAGS will be set _always_ further down
> +cflags_set=${CFLAGS+set}
> +
> AC_INIT(panel)
> AM_CONFIG_HEADER(config.h)
> +
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(gnome-core, 1.5.4)
>
> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
> @@ -28,6 +32,9 @@ dnl ====================================
>
> GNOME_PLATFORM_GNOME_2(yes)
> GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS(maximum)
> +if test x$cflags_set != xset ; then
> + CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $WARN_CFLAGS"
> +fi
I forgot it, except of 'make distcheck', WARN_CFLAGS will be set
as the same as GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS(yes), not
GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS(maximum).
Easy to check. In your log or Makefile, you'll see:
-Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
instead:
-Wall -Wunused -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith
as gnome2-macros/compiler-flags.m4 says.
--
German Poo Caaman~o
mailto:gpoo ubiobio cl
http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]