Re: Nautilus bugs and design choices
- From: <bordoley msu edu>
- To: merchan baton phys lsu edu, Gregory Merchan <merchan baton phys lsu edu>, nautilus-list gnome org
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Nautilus bugs and design choices
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 06:50:37 EDT
Gregory Merchan <merchan baton phys lsu edu> said:
> Nautilus has over 900 bugs open which are not marked as enhancement
requests.
Oh do we know, and many new bugs are just old dupes :)
>
> Here are two design choices which made could help resolve bugs. I list an
> advantage and two disadvantages for each. I hope that those replying will
> extend the lists and eventually a conclusion can be reached.
>
> Should Nautilus use internal views of non-folder content?
>
> This is using components such as eog, gnome-gv, and galeon within a
> nautilus window instead of opening one of those as a toplevel window.
> In other words, should a nautilus window ever have a view of something
> which cannot be reasonably presented as a collection of labelled icons?
>
> Advantage:
> Fewer open windows.
>
> Disadvantages:
> When the view changes the menus also change, more so than in a
> web browser.
> The window will contain a mix of menus, some of which apply to
> Nautilus generally and some which apply to the item in view.
People seem to like the views, so i think they should definately stay. That
said I think views for the most files (exception being the file manager ones)
should be provided by other apps instead of by nautilus (I'm thinking the
html view, which i hope will be replaced with a galeon view when galeon2 is
more stable, that said when i last used the galeon2 view a few weeks ago it
was pretty good). Also I don't think the nautilus ui should be comprimised
for the sake of views, ie. nautilus should not be turned into a web browser,
but should be aimed at being a desktop shell/file manager choose whichever
term you prefer.
>
>
> Should Nautilus support browser-style navigation?
>
> This is the mode where opening a folder from an icon view replaces the
> set of icons viewed with those in the newly opened folder.
> This is not MacOS or OS/2 "tunneling" where a folder is opened and its
> parent folder is closed. This does not apply to a multi-column view as
> in NeXT or a detail tree view as in MacOS Finder's outliner mode.
>
> Advantage:
> Fewer open windows.
>
> Disadvantages:
> Because of window size and position changes spatial relationships
> are lost.
> Back, foward, up, down, history, and so forth need to be supported.
>
Are you basically refering to single window mode. I use this all the time.
The browser arrows are very useful especially when using nautilus for remote
locations (ie. ftp if it worked well).
dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]