bugzilla blocking concrete proposal
- From: Wayne Schuller <k_wayne linuxpower org>
- To: bugmaster gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Cc: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>
- Subject: bugzilla blocking concrete proposal
- Date: 11 Jul 2002 10:17:12 +1000
hi Luis and everyone,
> No, no, no. I never said 'translators and 1.4 hackers shouldn't use
> bugzilla.' I said, very specifically, 'very old bug-buddies should
not
> function.' The leap between the two of those is /vast/.
The size of that leap is the question at hand.
If we block useful reports we are doing an evil thing (tm).
My point is: when doing any large scale culling or blocking, lets be
VERY careful not to lose anything useful.
Having said that, I am now feeling like I want to help find a good way
to block reports from apps that are too old.
Here is my idea:
In the products xml file for gnome bugzilla, lets add a field called
"minimum_version". We should hack bug-buddy to only let the user submit
a report if they have this minimum version.
For example: we would set the minimumversion of gnome-core to be 1.2.4
(which is the version that shipped with RH 7.1). If the user had an
earlier version bug-buddy would warn them or stop them.
(a warning might be better, we don't want users faking their version
field just to get past the check - that would cause much confusion)
It would be up to the maintainers to decide which is the oldest version
of their package they want to be the cut-off.
How would the maintainers control this?
I suggest a simple csv or xml file in the bugzilla cvs module. I could
hack the create-products.xml script to insert the field into the right
place in the xml file.
As most people aren't familiar with the bugzilla cvs module, everything
should be documented in a toplevel README.
What if maintainers didn't use this field?
If the field is blank than bug-buddy will work as normal. Probably
someone like luis or kmarass would help keep it up to date also.
What do you think of this idea?
If people are keen, I can write the server side stuff, I'd be willing to
write the bug-buddy patches also, maybe boc will want to though.
And of course this will only help us for future years, not with the old
bug-buddy's living in the world now.
And of course this feature could be used for evil (such as blocking out
all reports except from the current platform). In good faith I think it
could be used to block our truly useless reports.
ta,
wayne
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]