Re: 2.0.1 bug situation, esp. wrt ZVT

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 16:18, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > As it is, zvt is pretty unusable for anyone who needs anything outside
> > of [A-z]. So... IMHO, it's worth risking destabilizing it because the
> > remaining bug is so huge. I guess that's a judgement call, though- I'm
> > not sure whose.
> 
> My opinion is that the i18n support is a feature, we missed the 2.0.x
> boat on this feature, and we have to fix it in 2.2 rather than break
> the feature freeze and destabilize things. 

I have to disagree on this one; I'm sure our non-American/Aussie/Brit
users would feel the same way.

> The main reason I think this is that we need to move on to 2.2 when
> 2.0.2 comes out, and not a day later; 

I would think many modules will move before that. Certainly some are
ready and have already done so.

> and that means the main
> tinderbox/snapshot/testing/bugzilla work has to move to 2.1.x; and
> that means you aren't going to be able to test the large zvt changes
> effectively.

We're already testing them, and have been for several weeks.

> Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are darn close to 2.0.2 already,
> aren't we?

We're still 4-5 weeks away.
Luis