Re: Don't dare run out of diskspace while running Gnome...
- From: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, iain <iain ximian com>, Jim Gettys <jg pa dec com>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Don't dare run out of diskspace while running Gnome...
- Date: 15 Mar 2002 10:43:20 -0500
Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com> writes:
> Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 01:33, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > >
> > > iain <iain ximian com> writes:
> > > > Might it be nice for gnome-session to monitor the /home (all?) partition
> > > > (s) and bring up a pretty dialog when they near 0% free? Kinda like the
> > > > way windows (ME/2000?) does it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > That'd be cute. (Though we should still try to handle errors of
> > > course.)
> > >
> > > Annoying that it requires unportable code, though. :-(
> >
> > Isn't that what we have libgtop for ? Or is it not implemented in there?
> > (no, I am not suggesting to have gnome-session depend on libgtop)
>
> How about gnome-settings-daemon? That seems like a better place for
> this kind of thing, anyway. I don't have any huge problems with making
> it depend on libgnomevfs -- it's already a build requirement for the
> module.
Blah.
Now that I'm awake, I can see that I was completely incoherent last
night. gnome-control-center currently doesn't depend on libgtop at all.
I think this feature is pretty nice, though, so I think I'll add support
to gnome-settings-daemon anyway.
Does anyone know how complete libgtop's fs support is? I can make it
conditionally compile the check, but I'm wondering how many systems
aren't supported by it.
Thanks,
-Jonathan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]