Re: Mailing list cleanup proposal
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mailing list cleanup proposal
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:25:30 -0500 (EST)
Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A while back I proposed some changes to gnome-announce-list, and someone
> replied that we should do a complete clean-up of the mailing list mess we
> have. So, back in September I did this, and spoke to a few people about it,
> but haven't had time to post it for discussion and do it.
>
> It's mostly a cleanup of deprecated lists, and getting descriptions right.
> Jonathan asked what would happen to archives... About half of the deprecated
> lists are just shells, so their archives would be removed, the rest would be
> shifted with any list moves.
- Keeping URL's pointing to posts working is very important; the
URL on mail.gnome.org is the only way we have to an identify
a post, and there are tons of links, say, from bugzilla
to the gtk-devel-list archives.
- For that reason, you cannot merge archives between two lists;
the numbering will be changed for both lists. If you want to
do something complicated, you could merge the index pages; that
is, put the entries for http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-ui-hackers/
at the bottom of http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/
with a separate list.
- If renaming a list, we should put in a redirect to point references
to the old archives to the new archives.
- If we get rid of a list because there is no traffic, that doesn't
imply that it's archives aren't still interesting;
we should have a section at the bottom of http://mail.gnome.org/archives/
for old lists.
- Hmm...We should move the http://mail.gnome.org/archives/ index to a
multicolumn format or maybe add the descriptions there. The
duplication between that index and http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/
is a bit confusing to start with.
- I think having the listinfo/ and archives/ indices non-flat would
probably help. (Maybe grouped by category - lists for hackers, lists for
developers,list for users.) Since listinfo/ is part of mailman, maybe we
need to create our own index page and make listinfo/ a redirect
to there.
Couple of particular comments:
> gnome-kde-list NA DL Mostly freedesktop.org stuff now?
I'd say so, xdg-list freedesktop org is the place for technical
discussion. gnome-kde-list was more political, but I'm not sure
we need a place for that :-).
> gnome-i18n-tools NA DL,MD gnome-devtools
MD gnome-i18n probably better
> gnome-libs-devel IU RL,ID platform-devel-list (to fit with ddl)
Sounds like a reasonable rename to me, though of course, its
not going to cover the _entire_ platform.
> gnome-packaging-list NA DL,RT Greg - Is this still in use?
I think this is probably a case where there is a indentifiable
separate "community of people", even if the gpp is not doing
anything at the moment; it might be worth keeping around.
> libart NA DL,MD platform-devel-list
> libart-hackers NA DL,MD platform-devel-list
Don't think these should be consolidated. At last check, they
were being used by various people outside of the "gnome platform" -
in particular KDE. And they are pretty non-gnome-ish in
design. (No GLib dependency, for one thing.) Consolidating
the lists would say we think they are GNOME only. (Lesson learned
from gtk-i18n-list and Pango.)
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]