Re: GEP 3 - Remote activation in bonobo-activation

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Hi Guys,

On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 19:25, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > 'Scuse my ignorance, but isn't that what xinetd/inetd and company are
> > for?
> > 
> yes, I forgot to add that. The idea is to be a 'normal' server, which is
> just started via inetd/xinetd, with its entry in /etc/services.

	Notably - this non-requirement type specific solution focused section
got from the gep in a subsequent revision so ...

	Good points though,

		Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot