Re: GEP-4 : Versioning and branching rules proposal
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GEP-4 : Versioning and branching rules proposal
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:30:38 +1000
<quote who="Thomas Vander Stichele">
> Let's take an other example - metacity is up to version 2.4.0 - do we let
> it "downgrade" because of this and cause massive confusion when gnome 2.4
> is out ?
Heh, d'oh.
> I'd like to know what these rules would mean for fifth-toe stuff.
This is really only meant to apply to Developer Platform and Desktop stuff,
and even then, some of it is NOTQUITEGNOME.
For instance, I don't think this should necessarily apply to ORBit2,
libxml2/libxslt, GTK+, etc. Keeping the 100% GNOME stuff in line will be
great, but we can't expect it from everyone else.
Perhaps this should be called a 'recommendation', though I'd really love to
see some of the sanity-preserving stuff be a 'rule'. :-)
- Jeff
--
"Spend your 'different points' wisely." - Havoc Pennington
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]