Re: Status on API docs, please help to approve it.

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

"Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com> writes:

> Responding to my own mail...
> 
> If I remove the specification of AtkActionIface from atk-sections.txt I do not 
> get a report of AtkActionIface as an undocumented symbol.

But you *will* get a report of it as a symbol missing from 
atk-sections.txt...

What you want to do is move it to:

<SUBSECTION Standard>

or possibly:

<SUBSECTION Private>

Regards,
                                        Owen